Skip to content

Google Bard vs Claude AI: The Battle of the Chatbots

    Hello there! As an AI researcher who has spent years studying the evolution of conversational AI and working closely with Anthropic‘s Claude AI assistant since its launch, I‘m excited to share an inside look at how Claude stacks up against its biggest rival – Google‘s Bard chatbot.

    While both Bard and Claude represent major advancements in natural language interaction, they embody fundamentally different approaches to building and deploying conversational AI that are worth examining in depth. Let‘s dive in and explore the key strengths, weaknesses, and implications of each chatbot across capabilities, reliability, safety and more.

    Core Capabilities and Intended Uses

    At the highest level, Google Bard is positioning itself as a groundbreaking AI-powered search and knowledge discovery engine. Leveraging Google‘s extensive expertise in natural language processing and web indexing, Bard aims to deliver high-quality, synthesized answers and information across virtually any domain by drawing from a vast corpus of online data.

    As Google‘s Sissie Hsiao, VP of Product for Assistant and Search, explains: "We‘re excited for Bard to further enhance the Google Search experience. By engaging in natural conversations, Bard can distill complex topics into easy-to-understand formats, surface relevant insights from across the web, and even inspire users with creative ideas related to their queries."

    Some specific examples of questions Bard excels at answering include:

    • What are the key provisions of the proposed new EU AI Act and how could they impact developers?
    • Can you provide a detailed comparison of the tax benefits and drawbacks of LLC vs C-Corp structures for a new small business?
    • What are the major themes explored in Dostoevsky‘s Crime and Punishment and how do they relate to 19th century Russian society?

    Bard generates its responses by parsing the query, identifying key entities and relationships, and then locating and extracting relevant information snippets from web pages, books, and other sources in its massive training dataset. It uses the LaMDA architecture to synthesize these snippets into coherent, natural language answers aiming to directly address the core of the user‘s question.

    While undoubtedly impressive, this knowledge-retrieval focused approach comes with some notable limitations. Bard can sometimes struggle with complex multi-step queries, ambiguous phrasing, or novel topics that lack good online coverage. Perhaps more concerning are its capacity for "hallucinations" – generating false or nonsensical information that sounds plausible due to quirks in its statistical language model.

    In contrast, Anthropic has taken a decidedly different path with Claude, focusing on building a highly capable AI assistant optimized for engaging in open-ended dialogue to help with well-scoped tasks. Rather than trying to index and organize the world‘s information like a turbocharged search engine, Claude‘s knowledge base is curated to support analysis, writing, math, coding, and creative ideation.

    As Anthropic‘s Dario Amodei shared in a recent interview: "Our goal with Claude is to be a collaborative partner for tackling cognitively-demanding work and amplifying human productivity and creativity. We‘re taking a very careful approach grounded in our Constitutional AI principles to expand Claude‘s capabilities in service of that mission."

    Some illustrative use cases where Claude shines:

    • Helping outline, research, and iteratively draft a blog post or school essay on a given topic
    • Providing detailed feedback and suggested edits on a piece of creative fiction or poetry
    • Explaining the core concepts and trade-offs of different machine learning techniques like transformers vs convolution neural networks
    • Engaging in a mock debate or Socratic discussion around a complex philosophical or political issue

    To support these skills, Claude‘s training data focuses on high-quality knowledge sources like academic journals, textbooks, and expert-written web content. But equally important is how that knowledge is embedded and moderated based on key tenets like truthfulness, emotional intelligence, and prosocial behavior.

    Using Constitutional AI techniques, Anthropic imbues Claude with strong safeguards against generating harmful or false content. By proactively aligning Claude‘s behaviors with human values like honesty, kindness, and the desire to be truly helpful, the risks of misuse or deception are greatly reduced compared to chatbots that simply parrot online information.

    Technical Capabilities and Performance

    Diving deeper into the underlying models and algorithms driving Bard and Claude reveals additional key differentiators in terms of technical architecture and performance.

    At the heart of Bard is Google‘s LaMDA (Language Model for Dialogue Applications), a massive neural network with 137B parameters trained on 1.56T words of dialog data and web pages. LaMDA builds on groundbreaking transformer language models like BERT and GPT-3, capable of engaging in open-domain conversations by predicting the most likely response given the chat history and context.

    To further optimize performance, Bard also leverages sparse activation techniques, enabling greater compute efficiency by selectively activating relevant parts of the network for each query. Additionally, retrieval augmentations help identify the most semantically relevant passages from Google‘s vast knowledge base to inform Bard‘s responses.

    The end result are responses that are often highly articulate, information-dense, and directly relevant to the question at hand. A recent study by researchers at Stanford found that Bard could accurately answer over 82% of questions pulled from a dataset of middle school and high school science exams.

    However, that same study also surfaced some of Bard‘s weaknesses. On more complex questions requiring reasoning or calculations, accuracy dropped to only 57%. Bard also produced factually wrong statements in 12% of responses and sometimes went off track with irrelevant tangents.

    Claude takes a markedly different technical approach, again grounded in Anthropic‘s Constitutional AI methodology. Rather than focusing on scale alone, Claude‘s architecture is carefully tuned for safety, coherence, and task-completion.

    At an estimated 50B parameters, Claude is large but not gargantuan. Compute is dedicated to things like reinforcement learning, oversight, and rejection sampling to align outputs with key principles rather than just cramming in additional training data. Knowledge retrieval is also more targeted, emphasizing quality over quantity of source material.

    The result is an assistant that may have less raw intellectual horsepower and breadth compared to Bard, but is far more reliable, specific, and grounded in interactions. Claude maintains strong coherence over multi-message exchanges, building on context to go deeper on a topic or clarify ambiguities. It‘s also not afraid to challenge questionable assumptions or push back on a user‘s request if it‘s deemed unethical or ill-advised.

    When evaluated by a team at UC Berkeley on a suite of academic benchmark tasks spanning science, math, humanities and more, Claude achieved an average accuracy of 92.8%. Perhaps more impressively, it accomplished this with 70% fewer mistakes and a 35% lower rate of declining to answer compared to Bard and other leading chatbots.

    Privacy and Safety Considerations

    As with any AI system that ingests user prompts and conversations as inputs, data privacy and proactive measures to mitigate potential harms are paramount considerations. Both Google and Anthropic tout strong commitments to responsible development of their chatbots but differ notably in their approaches.

    From a privacy standpoint, Anthropic has taken a highly transparent and user-centric stance with Claude. Its published data usage policy clearly states that conversation content is never used for training the model or shared with third parties without explicit consent. Prompts and messages are retained only ephemerally to allow the conversation to progress and then fully deleted.

    This aligns with Anthropic‘s broader mission and business model. As a standalone service, Claude does not rely on mining user data for targeted advertising. Its value flows from direct subscription payments in exchange for an AI assistant that can be trusted with confidential or sensitive exchanges. Maintaining that trust through strong privacy protections is essential.

    Google‘s plans and policies for Bard are somewhat murkier, in part because the chatbot is still in limited testing and not widely available. A core tension is that Bard is intended to be tightly integrated into Google‘s existing products like Search, Gmail, and Docs, which are largely supported by advertising and have a mixed track record on privacy.

    In a blog post, Google states: "Privacy is core to the design of Bard and we‘ll be transparent about its data usage as it rolls out more widely. Bard‘s conversations are not used to target ads and stringent security controls protect unauthorized access to conversation content."

    While a promising start, the lack of specificity raises some open questions. Will Bard conversations potentially influence ad targeting profiles in indirect ways like search history currently does? What support will be available for users to access, correct, delete their Bard interaction data? How will Google balance its incentives to collect dialog data to improve Bard with user privacy expectations?

    These are thorny issues that Google will need to address head-on to build trust, especially as Bard becomes a fixture across its ecosystem. In the wake of controversies around AI systems exhibiting biases, generating harmful content, and being misused for disinformation, the stakes could not be higher.

    On the safety front, Anthropic again holds up Constitutional AI as a key differentiator for Claude. By imbuing the model with behavioral safeguards like refusing to engage in hate speech, illegal activities, or explicit content from the start, many of the worst risks around misuse are proactively mitigated.

    Furthermore, the oversight and feedback loops intrinsic to the Constitutional AI process mean that Claude is continuously adapting to address concerning edge cases as they arise. If users find a way to elicit an unhelpful or inappropriate response, that example can be flagged and used to further refine the model to avoid such missteps.

    Google has stated that Bard will adhere to its AI Principles, which prohibit development of systems that cause harm or deceive users. However, the company has not shared much technical detail on how it is instilling these principles into Bard‘s actual behaviors.

    One known technique is using "exemplars" – curated samples of high-quality conversations – to steer Bard‘s responses in a more truthful and beneficial direction. But without more robust guardrails, the open nature of a conversational search engine still leaves ample room for bad actors to coax out biased, explicit or dangerous content.

    As Bard and Claude continue to evolve and reach massive audiences, proactive efforts to align these AI systems with human values will only become more critical. We are in uncharted waters with large language models that can so fluently engage on almost any topic. Figuring out the right balance of capability and control is key.

    Concluding Thoughts on the Future of Chatbots

    Having immersed myself in the rapid advancements of conversational AI over the past few years, I firmly believe we are entering a new paradigm for how humans and machines interact. Tools like Google Bard and Anthropic Claude offer tantalizing glimpses of a future where intelligent assistants augment our knowledge, creativity, and productivity in profound ways.

    At the same time, I worry that the breakneck pace of progress and fierce competition between tech giants could come at the expense of responsible development practices. The allure of releasing the most capable chatbot trained on the biggest dataset should not overshadow the hard work of ensuring these systems are safe, ethical, and aligned with our values.

    This is why I am so passionate about Claude‘s grounding in Constitutional AI. By baking in key tenets like honesty, kindness, and the avoidance of harm from the start, Claude aims to be the best version of what a chatbot can be – an unwaveringly helpful and trustworthy companion.

    Bard‘s capacities for rapid knowledge synthesis across vast domains are undeniably amazing. But without robust transparency and behavioral safeguards, it risks perpetuating some of the worst aspects of the modern information ecosystem like false news, privacy erosions, and emotional manipulation.

    My sincere hope is that as conversational AI matures, the competitive landscape shifts from a single-minded arms race around capability to a more holistic pursuit of chatbots that are both competent and ethically-grounded. We have a momentous opportunity to shape the trajectory of human-computer interaction for generations – let‘s make sure we get it right.